Powered By:


Representative Josh Gottheimer (D-NJ) has circulated a draft bill among House Financial Services members that would limit the entities that are permitted to issue stablecoins. The draft is for discussion purposes at this point and has not yet been officially introduced.

The draft bill defines stablecoins as “any cryptocurrency or other privately issued digital financial instrument that is collateralized on a one-to-one basis by United States dollars.” The draft contains the following salient provisions:

  • Stablecoins would not be “securities” or “commodities” “for purposes of State and Federal securities and commodities laws.”
  • Stablecoins may only be issued by an insured depository institution or a “nonbank qualified stablecoin issuer.”
  • Any person may become a nonbank qualified stablecoin issuer by notifying the U.S. Department of the Treasury
  • A nonbank qualified stablecoin issuer must maintain collateral in an amount equal to 100 percent of the value of outstanding stablecoins in either U.S. dollars (on deposit in an insured depository institution) or Treasury securities.
  • Stablecoins issued by an insured depository institution would be eligible for FDIC deposit insurance.
  • The FDIC would be directed to establish a “Stablecoin Insurance Fund” to insure stablecoins issued by nonbank qualified stablecoin issuers up to $250,000 per holder.


The bill has only just been circulated for discussion purposes. Representative Gottheimer is likely searching for co-sponsors prior to introducing the bill, if it is to be introduced at all. It seems unlikely that without one or more influential co-sponsors, or explicit White House support, the bill will advance or be passed into law during this Congressional term. It remains to be seen whether the key components of this draft bill are the starting place of a discussion to regulate stablecoins.

The opinions expressed are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the firm or its clients, or any of its or their respective affiliates. This article is for general information purposes and is not intended to be and should not be taken as legal advice.


Fill out the following form to receive our cryptocurrency news and analysis.

Author's Assets

Casey Jennings

Casey Jennings | Associate

A member of Seward & Kissel’s Financial Services Regulatory Group and Blockchain and Cryptocurrency Group, Casey advises financial services companies – including banks, broker-dealers, investment funds, service providers, and financial technology companies – on federal and state banking and securities law issues and the structuring of new financial products, including anti-money laundering, deposit issues, token offerings, custody of traditional and crypto assets, transfer and liquidity issues, Volcker Rule issues, and investments in crypto assets by funds and other investors. Before joining the firm, Casey served as counsel to the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, where he developed and implemented financial regulatory policy, including the first CFPB rulemaking to rely on unfair, deceptive, and abusive acts and practices (UDAAPs) authority. Since then, he has:

  • Represented e-retailer APMEX Inc. and alternative asset manager Sprott Inc. in connection with the launch of the online marketplace, OneGold.com.

“The whole notion of crypto is that there are no gatekeepers and the BSA requires that there be gatekeepers. Those two notions are very much at odds with one another. But the BSA is the best system that we’ve got right now.”

Casey’s perspective on crypto AML regulations as published in Cointelegraph article “How U.S. authorities are using old AML tools to crack down on crypto”